欢迎访问《新能源进展》官方网站!今天是
论文

海域天然气水合物钻探研究进展及启示(I):站位选择

  • 苏 明 ,
  • 匡增桂 ,
  • 乔少华 ,
  • 沙志彬 ,
  • 魏 伟 ,
  • 张金华 ,
  • 苏丕波 ,
  • 杨 睿 ,
  • 吴能友 ,
  • 丛晓荣
展开
  • 1. 中国科学院天然气水合物重点实验室,广州 510640;
    2. 中国科学院广州天然气水合物研究中心,广州 510640;           
    3. 广州海洋地质调查局,广州 510760;
    4. 中国地质大学(武汉)资源学院,武汉 430074;                                   
    5. 中国石油勘探开发研究院廊坊分院,河北 廊坊 065007
苏 明(1983-),男,博士,副研究员,目前主要从事深水沉积体系及资源效应、海域天然气水合物成藏地质条件分析等方面的科研工作。

收稿日期: 2015-01-14

  修回日期: 2015-02-11

  网络出版日期: 2015-04-29

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(41202080);
中国石油科技创新基金(2013D-5006-0105);
中国科学院重点部署项目(KGZD-EW-301)

The Progresses and Revelations of Marine Gas Hydrate Explorations (I): Purposes and Selection Evidences of the Hydrate Drilling Sites

  • SU Ming ,
  • KUANG Zenggui ,
  • QIAO Shaohua ,
  • SHA Zhibin ,
  • WEI Wei ,
  • ZHANG Jinhua ,
  • SU Pibo ,
  • YANG Rui ,
  • WU Nengyou ,
  • CONG Xiaorong
Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Gas Hydrate, Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China;
    2. Guangzhou Center for Gas Hydrate Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China;
    3. Guangzhou Marine Geological Survey, Guangzhou 510760, China;
    4. Faculty of Earth Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China;
    5. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development-Langfang, Hebei Langfang 065007, China

Received date: 2015-01-14

  Revised date: 2015-02-11

  Online published: 2015-04-29

摘要

本文通过对国外海域天然气水合物钻探的调研,选取布莱克海台、水合物脊、墨西哥湾、日本南海海槽、韩国郁龙盆地、印度大陆边缘等区域,从水合物站位选择目的和站位选择依据这两个方面进行归纳总结和系统对比。研究指出,根据水合物的实际产出和赋存,可将其划分为两大类型:赋存于海底浅表层的水合物(一般在海底之下100 m范围内)和赋存于海底之下中−深层的水合物(一般在海底之下100 ~ 400 m范围内)。前者的主要识别依据为海水异常、含气流体运移通道和异常地形地貌特征,而后者的主要识别依据为地球物理异常反射特征、含气流体运移通道和有利沉积体。因此,如果将水合物的形成、聚集和分布比喻为一个有机的整体,那么“运”和“聚”就构成了这个系统的“骨骼”和“血液”,它们将控制远景区内的水合物分布。将“水合物识别标志”、“有利沉积体展布”和“流体运移通道”三者有机地结合在一起,可以达到更准确地预测和描述水合物矿体的目的,这是今后海域水合物钻探站位选择依据的主要发展方向。

本文引用格式

苏 明 , 匡增桂 , 乔少华 , 沙志彬 , 魏 伟 , 张金华 , 苏丕波 , 杨 睿 , 吴能友 , 丛晓荣 . 海域天然气水合物钻探研究进展及启示(I):站位选择[J]. 新能源进展, 2015 , 3(2) : 116 -130 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-560X.2015.02.007

Abstract

In order to better understanding the progresses of marine gas hydrate explorations, this study summarized the hydrate drill site objectives and drill site selections through some analyses on Blake Ridge, Hydrate Ridge, Gulf of Mexico, Nankai Trough, Ulleung Basin, and Indian continental margin. According to the actual occurrences, marine gas hydrates might be classified as two types, hydrates in the shallow layers near seafloor (generally within the range of 100 m below the seafloor), and hydrates in the relatively deep sediments (generally within the range of 100 ~ 400 m below the seafloor). The main indicators for site selection of hydrates in the shallow layers are anomalies in seawater, migrations of gas-bearing fluids and specific seafloor topographic features. On the contrast, the main indicators for site selection of hydrates in the deep layers are geophysical anomalies, migrations of gas-bearing fluids and distributions of favorable sediments. Therefore, for the marine gas hydrates system, fluids migrations and potential reservoirs could be referred to as bones and bloods, which might control the distribution of marine gas hydrates in the promising prospecting areas. In combination of anomalies related to hydrates, migrations of gas/fluids and favorable deep-water sediments, the predictions would be more accurate, which could be suggested as the developing trend of site selections for marine gas hydrates.

参考文献

[1] Kvenvolden K A. Gas Hydrates—Geological perspective and global change[J]. Reviews of Geophysics, 1993, 31(2): 173-187.

[2] Collett T S. Energy resource potential of natural gas hydrates[J]. AAPG bulletin, 2002, 86(11): 1971-1992.

[3] Maslin M, Owen M, Day S, et al. Linking continental-slope failures and climate change: Testing the clathrate gun hypothesis[J]. Geology, 2004, 32(1): 53-56.

[4] Maslin M, Owen M, Betts R, et al. Gas hydrates: Past and future geohazard?[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2010, 368(1919): 2369-2393.

[5] Archer D. Methane hydrate stability and anthropogenic climate change[J]. Biogeosciences, 2007, 4(4): 521-544.

[6] Paull C K, Matsumoto R, Wallace P J. Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Vol. 164, Initial Reports, Gas Hydrate Sampling on the Blake Ridge and Carolina Rise[M]. Ocean Drilling Program, College Station, TX, 1996.

[7] Tréhu A M, Bohrmann G, Rack F R. Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Vol. 204, Initial Reports, Drilling Gas Hydrates on Hydrate Ridge, Cascadia Continental Margin[M]. Ocean Drilling Program, College Station, TX, 2003.

[8] Riedel M, Collett T S, Malone M J. Proceedings of the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program, Vol. 311, Expedition Reports, Cascadia Margin Gas Hydrates[M]. Integrated Ocean Drilling Program, U.S. Implementing Organization Science Services, TX, 2005.

[9] Ruppel C, Boswell R, Jones E. Scientific results from Gulf of Mexico Gas Hydrates Joint Industry Project Leg 1 drilling: Introduction and overview[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2008, 25(9): 819-829.

[10] Collett T S, Boswell R. Resource and hazard implications of gas hydrates in the Northern Gulf of Mexico: Results of the 2009 Joint Industry Project Leg II Drilling Expedition[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2012, 34(1): 1-3.

[11] Colwell F, Matsumoto R, Reed D. A review of the gas hydrates, geology, and biology of the Nankai Trough[J]. Chemical Geology, 2004, 205(3/4): 391-404.

[12] Tsuji Y, Ishida H, Nakamizu M, et al. Overview of the MITI Nankai Trough Wells: A Milestone in the Evaluation of Methane Hydrate Resources[J]. Resource Geology, 2004, 54(1): 3-10.

[13] Ryu B J, Riedel M, Kim J H, et al. Gas Hydrates in the Western Deep-Water Ulleung Basin, East Sea of Korea[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2009, 26(8): 1483-1498.

[14] Ryu B J, Collett T S, Riedel M, et al. Scientific Results of the Second Gas Hydrate Drilling Expedition in the Ulleung Basin (UBGH2)[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2013, 47: 1-20.

[15] Ramana M, Ramprasad T, Paropkari A, et al. Multidisciplinary investigations exploring indicators of gas hydrate occurrence in the Krishna-Godavari Basin Offshore, East Coast of India[J]. Geo-Marine Letters, 2009, 29(1): 25-38.

[16] Sain K, Gupta H. Gas hydrates in India: Potential and development[J]. Gondwana Research, 2012, 22(2): 645-657.

[17] Borowski W S. A Review of methane and gas hydrates in the dynamic, stratified system of the Blake Ridge Region, Offshore Southeastern North America[J]. Chemical Geology, 2004, 205(3/4): 311-346.

[18] Hornbach M J, Ruppel C, Saffer D M, et al. Coupled geophysical constraints on heat flow and fluid flux at a salt diaper[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2005, 32(24), L24617. doi: 10.1029/2005GL024862.

[19] Rowe M M, Gettrust J F. Faulted structure of the bottom simulating reflector on the Blake Ridge, Western North-Atlantic[J]. Geology, 1993, 21(9): 833-836.

[20] McNeill L C, Goldfinger C, Kulm L D, et al. Tectonics of the Neogene Cascadia forearc basin: Investigations of a deformed late Miocene unconformity[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 2000, 112(8): 1209-1224.

[21] Johnson J E, Goldfinger C, Suess E. Geophysical constraints on the surface distribution of authigenic carbonates across the Hydrate Ridge region, Cascadia margin[J]. Marine Geology, 2003, 202(1/2): 79-120.

[22] Teichert B M A, Torres M E, Bohrmann G, et al. Fluid sources, fluid pathways and diagenetic reactions across an accretionary prism revealed by Sr and B geochemistry[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2005, 239(1/2): 106-121.

[23] Torres M E, Wallmann K, Tréhu A M, et al. Gas hydrate growth, methane transport, and chloride enrichment at the southern summit of Hydrate Ridge, Cascadia Margin Off Oregon[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2004, 226(1/2): 225-241.

[24] Heeschen K U, Tréhu A M, Collier R W, et al. Distribution and height of methane bubble plumes on the Cascadia Margin characterized by acoustic imaging[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2003, 30(12): 1643. doi:10.1029/2003GL016974.

[25] Suess E, Torres M E, Bohrmann G, et al. Sea floor methane hydrates at Hydrate Ridge, Cascadia Margin[M]. Washington DC: American Geophysical Union, 2001.

[26] Dai J C, Snyder F, Gillespie D, et al. Exploration for gas hydrates in the deepwater, Northern Gulf of Mexico: Part I. A seismic approach based on geologic model, inversion, and rock physics principles[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2008, 25(9): 830-844.

[27] Wood W T, Hart P E, Hutchinson D R, et al. Gas and gas hydrate distribution around seafloor seeps in Mississippi Canyon, Northern Gulf of Mexico, using multi-resolution seismic imagery[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2008, 25(9): 952-959.

[28] Cooper A K, Hart P E. High-resolution seismic-reflection investigation of the northern Gulf of Mexico gas-hydrate-stability zone[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2003, 19(10): 1275-1293.

[29] Kastner M, Claypool G, Robertson G. Geochemical constraints on the origin of the pore fluids and gas hydrate distribution at Atwater Valley and Keathley Canyon, northern Gulf of Mexico[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2008, 25(9): 860-872.

[30] Lee M W, Collett T S. Integrated analysis of well logs and seismic data to estimate gas hydrate concentrations at Keathley Canyon, Gulf of Mexico[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2008, 25(9): 924-931.

[31] Cook A E, Goldberg D, Kleinberg R L. Fracture-controlled gas hydrate systems in the Northern Gulf of Mexico[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2008, 25(9): 932-941.

[32] Collett T S. Gas hydrate petroleum systems in marine and arctic permafrost environments[C]. GCSSEPM Proceedings, 2009. http://gcsproceedings. sepmonline. org/content/gcs029/1/SEC8.body.pdf.

[33] Boswell R, Collett T S, Frye M, et al. Subsurface gas hydrates in the northern Gulf of Mexico[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2012, 34(1): 4-30.

[34] Boswell R, Frye M, Shelander D, et al. Architecture of gas-hydrate-bearing sands from Walker Ridge 313, Green Canyon 955, and Alaminos Canyon 21: Northern deepwater Gulf of Mexico[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2012b, 34(1): 134-149.

[35] McConnell D, Zhang Z. Using acoustic inversion to image buried gas hydrate distribution[J]. Fire in the Ice, 2005, 5(4): 3-5.

[36] Collett T S, Lee M W, Zyrianova M V, et al. Gulf of Mexico Gas Hydrate Joint Industry Project Leg II logging-while-drilling data acquisition and analysis[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2012, 34(1): 41-61.

[37] Shelander D, Dai J C, Bunge G, et al. Estimating saturation of gas hydrates using conventional 3D seismic data, Gulf of Mexico Joint Industry Project Leg II[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2012, 34(1): 96-110.

[38] Frye M, Shedd W, Boswell R. Gas hydrate resource potential in the Terrebonne Basin, Northern Gulf of Mexico[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2012, 34(1): 150-168.

[39] Noguchi S, Shimoda N, Takano O, et al. 3-D internal architecture of methane hydrate-bearing turbidite channels in the Eastern Nankai Trough, Japan[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2011, 28(10): 1817-1828.

[40] Akihisa K, Tezuka K, Senoh O, et al. Well log evaluation of gas hydrate saturation in the MITI Nankai-Trough Well, offshore South East Japan[C]. Proc. SPWLA 43th Ann. Logging Symp., 2002, 1-14.

[41] Masuda Y, Yamamoto K, Tadaaki S, et al. Japan’s Methane Hydrate R&D Program Progresses to Phase 2[J]. Fire in the Ice, 2009, 9(4): 1-6.

[42] Inamori T, Hato M. Detection of methane hydrate-bearing zones from seismic data[J]. Resource Geology, 2004, 54(1): 99-104.

[43] Fujii T, Nakamizu M, Tsuji Y, et al. Methane-hydrate occurrence and saturation confirmed from core samples, eastern Nankai Trough, Japan[M]. In: Collett T, Johnson A, Knapp C, Boswell R, eds., Natural gas hydrates—Energy resource potential and associated geologic hazards. AAPG Memoir 89, 2009, 385-400.

[44] Yoon S H, Chough S K. Regional strike slip in the eastern continental margin of Korea and its tectonic implications for the evolution of Ulleung Basin, East Sea (Sea of Japan)[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 1995, 107(1): 83-97.

[45] Lee G H, Kim H J, Han S J, et al. Seismic stratigraphy of the deep Ulleung Basin in the East Sea (Japan Sea) back-arc basin[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2001, 18(5): 615-634.

[46] Bahk J J, Kim D H, Chun J H, et al. Gas hydrate occurrences and their relation to host sediment properties: Results from second Ulleung Basin Gas Hydrate Drilling Expedition, East Sea[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2013, 47: 21-29.

[47] Bahk J J, Kim J H, Kong G S, et al. Occurrence of near-seafloor gas hydrates and associated cold vents in the Ulleung Basin, East Sea[J]. Geosciences Journal, 2009, 13(4): 371-385.

[48] Kim G Y, Yi B Y, Yoo D G, et al. Evidence of gas hydrate from downhole logging data in the Ulleung Basin, East Sea[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2011, 28(10): 1979-1985.

[49] Chun J H, Ryu B J, Son B K, et al. Sediment mounds and other sedimentary features related to hydrate occurrences in a columnar seismic blanking zone of the Ulleung Basin, East Sea, Korea[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2011, 28(10): 1787-1800.

[50] Bahk J J, Um I K, Holland M. Core lithologies and their constraints on gas-hydrate occurrence in the East Sea, offshore Korea: Results from the site UBGH1-9[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2011, 28(10): 1943-1952.

[51] Park K, Bahk J J, Kwon Y G, et al. Korean National Program Expedition confirms rich gas hydrate deposits in the Ulleung Basin, East Sea[J]. Fire in the Ice, 2008, 8(2): 6-9.

[52] Riedel M, Collett T S, Kim H S, et al. Large-scale depositional characteristics of the Ulleung Basin and its impact on electrical resistivity and Archie-parameters for gas hydrate saturation estimates[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2013, 47: 222-235.

[53] Scholz N A, Riedel M, Bahk J J, et al. Mass transport deposits and gas hydrate occurrences in the Ulleung Basin, East Sea e Part 1: Mapping sedimentation patterns using seismic coherency[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2012, 35(1): 91-104.

[54] Riedel M, Bahk J J, Scholz N A, et al. Mass-transport deposits and gas hydrate occurrences in the Ulleung Basin, East Sea–Part 2: Gas hydrate content and fracture-induced anisotropy[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2012, 35(1): 75-90.

[55] Collett T S, Riedel M, Cochran J R, et al. Indian continental margin gas hydrate prospects: Results of the Indian National Gas Hydrate Program (NGHP) Expedition 01[C]. International Conference on Gas Hydrates (ICGH 2008), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2008.

[56] Dewangan P, Sriram G, Ramprasad T, et al. Fault system and thermal regime in the vicinity of Site NGHP-01-10, Krishna–Godavari Basin, Bay of Bengal[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2011, 28(10): 1899-1914.

[57] Riedel M, Collett T S, Kumar P, et al. Seismic imaging of a fractured gas hydrate system in the Krishna-Godavari Basin Offshore India[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2010, 27(7): 1476-1493.

[58] Riedel M, Collett T S, Shankar U. Documenting channel features associated with gas hydrates in the Krishna–Godavari Basin, Offshore India[J]. Marine Geology, 2011, 279(1/4): 1-11.

[59] 苏明, 乔少华, 魏伟, 等. 墨西哥湾天然气水合物油气系统[J]. 新能源进展, 2013, 1(2): 65-72.

[60] 乔少华, 苏明, 杨睿, 等. 运聚体系——天然气水合物不均匀性分布的关键控制因素初探[J]. 新能源进展, 2013, 1(3): 245-256.

文章导航

/