基于文献计量的碳交易研究态势分析
收稿日期: 2016-06-13
修回日期: 2016-08-20
网络出版日期: 2016-10-28
基金资助
基金项目：广东省软科学研究计划项目（2015A070704038）；
中国科学院广州能源研究所所长创新培育基金（y407pc1001）
Emission Trading Research Trend Analysis Based on Bibliometric
Received date: 2016-06-13
Revised date: 2016-08-20
Online published: 2016-10-28
本文基于Web of Science的SSCI和SCI-E数据库，利用文献计量学方法，对碳交易研究领域的产出情况进行了数据分析。结果表明：碳交易研究的科研产出整体呈增长态势，其趋势变化与关键事件的时间节点相吻合；美国在碳交易研究领域具有较强的影响力，中国虽然起步较晚，但近年来论文的影响力增长迅速，中国科学院的发文数量位居研究机构第一位；通过关键词的词频分析，本文归纳出该研究领域的五个研究热点，分别为行政政策、市场机制、经济影响、替代效应、环境效应；有不少研究采用了模型工具，论文中采用的模型分析方法主要为投入产出模型、最优化模型和一般均衡模型。
王 昭 , 秦汉时 , 林丽珊 , 汪 鹏 , 赵黛青 . 基于文献计量的碳交易研究态势分析[J]. 新能源进展, 2016 , 4(5) : 417 -424 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-560X.2016.05.013
Based on SSCI and SCI-E of Web of Science, the research output of emission trading has been analyzed by using bibliometric method in this paper. The results show that, the total research output of carbon trading research keeps increasing and the focusing arguments coincide with the time of related key events. The United States has the strongest influence in the emission trading research fields. Although China started to conduct related researches quite late, the impact of related papers was growing rapidly in recent years. The number of articles published by Chinese Academy of Sciences ranked the first place among the research institutes. By adopting frequency analysis of keywords, it is concluded there are five focuses in the emission trading research field: emission trading policy, market mechanism, economic impact, substitution effect and environmental effect. Many studies adopted different modeling tools such as input-output models, optimization models and general equilibrium models.
[1] 徐玉高, 郭元, 吴宗鑫. 碳权分配: 全球碳排放权交易及参与激励[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 1997(3): 72-77.
[2] 康艳兵. 制度顶层设计是实现碳交易政策目标的关键[J]. 国家电网, 2014(4): 20.
[3] 荆克迪. 中国碳交易市场的机制设计与国际比较研究[D]. 南开: 南开大学, 2014.
[4] 方蕾. 我国碳税与碳交易机制的设计研究[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2012.
[5] 郑爽, 窦勇. 利用经济手段应对气候变化-碳税与碳交易对比分析[J]. 中国能源, 2013, 35(10): 11-15. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2355.2013.10.002.
[6] 魏庆坡. 碳交易与碳税兼容性分析-兼论中国减排路径选择[J]. 中国人口•资源与环境, 2015, 25(5): 35-43. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2015.05.005.
[7] 石敏俊, 袁永娜, 周晟吕, 等. 碳减排政策: 碳税、碳交易还是两者兼之?[J]. 管理科学学报, 2013, 16(9): 9-19.
[8] 汤铃, 武佳倩, 戴伟, 等. 碳交易机制对中国经济与环境的影响[J]. 系统工程学报, 2014, 29(5): 701-712. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5781.2014.05.014.
[9] 任松彦, 戴瀚程, 汪鹏, 等. 碳交易政策的经济影响: 以广东省为例[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2015, 11(1): 61-67. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1719.2015.01.009.
[10] 许小虎, 马晓明, 张雯, 等. 欧盟航空碳交易的经济影响研究进展[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 48(5): 855-861.
[11] 崔金星. 中国碳交易法律促导机制研究[J]. 中国人口•资源与环境, 2012, 22(8): 33-40. DOI: 10.3969/ j.issn.1002-2104.2012.08.006.
[12] 何晶晶. 构建中国碳排放权交易法初探[J]. 中国软科学, 2013(9): 10-22. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-9753. 2013.09.002.
[13] 李挚萍, 程凌香. 碳交易立法的基本领域探讨[J]. 江苏大学学报(社会科学版), 2012, 14(3): 22-29. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6604.2012.03.004.
[14] 庞景安. 科学计量研究方法论[M]. 北京: 科学技术文献出版社, 2002: 123-125.
[15] 王立伟, 郑军卫, 赵纪东, 等. 基于文献计量的铝矿科技发展态势分析[J]. 资源科学, 2014, 36(3): 653-659.
[16] 王亚俊, 曾凡江. 中国绿洲研究文献分析及研究进展[J]. 干旱区研究, 2010, 27(4): 501-506.
[17] 陈欣然, 吴均, 张晓琴, 等. 基于SCI论文的中国水产科研态势分析[J]. 中国水产科学, 2013, 20(2): 442-455. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1118.2013.00442.
[18] 张波, 王金平. 基于文献计量的生物柴油研究发展态势分析[J]. 可再生能源, 2014, 32(8): 1195-1200.
[19] ZHANG K, WANG Q, LIANG Q M, et al. A bibliometric analysis of research on carbon tax from 1989 to 2014[J]. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2016, 58: 297-310. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015. 12.089.
[20] WAN T J, SHEN S M, BANDYOPADHYAY A, et al. Bibliometric analysis of carbon dioxide reduction research trends during 1999-2009[J]. Separation and purification technology, 2012, 94: 87-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2011.07.022.
[21] HIRSCH J E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output[J]. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102(46): 16569-16572. DOI: 10.1073/pnas. 0507655102.
[22] 魏一鸣, 米志付, 张皓. 气候政策建模研究综述: 基于文献计量分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2013, 28(8): 930-938. DOI: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2013.08.0930.
[23] PETERS G P, HERTWICH E G. CO2 embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy[J]. Environmental science & technology, 2008, 42(5): 1401-1407. DOI: 10.1021/es072023k.
[24] SU B, ANG B W. Input-output analysis of CO2 emissions embodied in trade: the effects of spatial aggregation[J]. Ecological economics, 2010, 70(1): 10-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.08.016.
[25] TIAN J, LIAO H, WANG C. Spatial-temporal variations of embodied carbon emission in global trade flows: 41 economies and 35 sectors[J]. Natural hazards, 2015, 78(2): 1125-1144. DOI: 10.1007/s11069-015-1761-3.
[26] SATO M. Product level embodied carbon flows in bilateral trade[J]. Ecological economics, 2014, 105: 106-117. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.05.006.
[27] ZHONG Z Q, HUANG R, TANG Q N, et al. China’s provincial CO2 emissions embodied in trade with implications for regional climate policy[J]. Frontiers of earth science, 2015, 9(1): 77-90. DOI: 10.1007/ s11707-014-0450-y.
[28] REN S G, YUAN B L, MA X, et al. The impact of international trade on China? s industrial carbon emissions since its entry into WTO[J]. Energy policy, 2014, 69: 624-634. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.02.032.
[29] CHENG B B, DAI H C, WANG P, et al. Impacts of carbon trading scheme on air pollutant emissions in Guangdong Province of China[J]. Energy for sustainable development, 2015, 27: 174-185. DOI: 10.1016/ j.esd.2015.06.001.
[30] WANG P, DAI H C, REN S Y, et al. Achieving Copenhagen target through carbon emission trading: Economic impacts assessment in Guangdong Province of China[J]. Energy, 2015, 79: 212-227. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.11.009.
[31] LI W, LU C. The research on setting a unified interval of carbon price benchmark in the national carbon trading market of China[J]. Applied energy, 2015, 155: 728-739. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.06.018.
[32] HÜBLER M, VOIGT S, LÖSCHEL A. Designing an emissions trading scheme for China-An up-to-date climate policy assessment[J]. Energy policy, 2014, 75: 57-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.02.019.
[33] NI W J, SHU J. Trade-off between service time and carbon emissions for safety stock placement in multi-echelon supply chains[J]. International journal of production research, 2015, 53(22): 6701-6718. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2015.1056319.
[34] BING X Y, BLOEMHOF-RUWAARD J, CHAABANE A, et al. Global reverse supply chain redesign for household plastic waste under the emission trading scheme[J]. Journal of cleaner production, 2015, 103: 28-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.019.
[35] ZHU Y, LI Y P, HUANG G H. An optimization decision support approach for risk analysis of carbon emission trading in electric power systems[J]. Environmental modelling & software, 2015, 67: 43-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.12.024.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
