
0 引言
1 实验材料及方法
1.1 实验试剂及原料
Table 1 Characteristics of activated sludge表1 活性污泥基本特性 |
Indicator | Value |
---|---|
pH | 6.85 |
VSS/TSS | 0.66 |
CST / s | 11.90 |
Zeta potential / mV | -14.20 |
SCOD / (mg/L) | 32.00 |
SV30 / % | 18.50 |
Table 2 Proximate analysis and elemental analysis of sludge cake表2 污泥元素分析及工业分析 |
Proximate analysis | Ultimate analysis | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Moisture / % | Asha / % | Volatile mattera / % | Fixed carbon / % | C / % | H / % | N / % | S / % | |
99.43 | 63.24 | 33.50 | 3.26 | 16.01 | 3.02 | 2.53 | 0.88 |
Note: adry basis. |
1.2 批量试验
Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of extracellular polymer extraction: (a) total extracellular polymers extraction; (b) stratified extraction of extracellular polymers (RFC stands for relative centrifugal force)图1 胞外聚合物提取流程示意图:(a)总胞外聚合物提取方法;(b)胞外聚合物分层提取(RFC指相对离心力) |
1.3 分析方法
2 结果与分析
2.1 酸化处理对胞外聚合物及污泥脱水效果影响
Fig. 2 Fluorescence spectra of total extracellular polymers图2 总胞外聚合物荧光光谱图 |
Table 3 Peak of total extracellular polymer fluorescence spectrum表3 总胞外聚合物荧光光谱峰位 |
WAS samples | λex/λem / nm | Main materials |
---|---|---|
T-EPS | 230.0/350.0 235.0/370.0 235.0/380.0 | Aromatic protein |
280.0/365.0 | Protein-like | |
250.0/455.0 285.0/385.0 295.0/450.0 | Humic acid-like | |
S-EPS | 230.0/355.0 235.0/370.0 | Aromatic protein |
240.0/405.0 250.0/450.0 | Fulvic acid-like | |
275.0/380.0 280.0/370.0 | Protein-like | |
275.0/405.0 275.0/415.0 280.0/385.0 280.0/400.0 295.0/450.0 300.0/445.0 315.0/420.0 | Humic acid-like | |
LB-EPS | 225.0/345.0 225.0/355.0 | Aromatic protein |
270.0/410.0 | Protein-like | |
275.0/340.0 280.0/345.0 | Humic acid-like | |
TB-EPS | 225.0/400.0 235.0/395.0 | Fulvic acid-like |
285.0/355.0 | Protein-like | |
310.0/395.0 | Humic acid-like |
Fig. 3 Protein (a), polysaccharide (b), and total organic (c) contents of EPS samples at pH = 2-7图3 pH = 2 ~ 7条件下,EPS蛋白质含量(a)、多糖含量(b)和有机物总含量(c) |
Fig. 4 Zeta potential changes (a) and conductivity changes (b) of EPS samples at pH = 2-7图4 pH = 2 ~ 7条件下,EPS界面电动势变化图(a)和聚合物电导率变化图(b) |
Fig. 5 FTIR of T-EPS (a), S-EPS (b), LB-EPS (c), and TB-EPS (d) samples at pH = 2-7图5 pH = 2 ~ 7条件下,总胞外聚合物(a)、S-EPS(b)、LB-EPS(c)和TB-EPS(d)的红外光谱图 |
Fig. 6 Settlement curves of activated sludge at pH = 2-7图6 pH = 2 ~ 7条件下,污泥沉降界面随时间变化 |
Fig. 7 CST and moisture content of activated sludge at pH = 2-7图7 pH = 2 ~ 7条件下,污泥毛细吸水时间和泥饼含水率 |
2.2 氧化处理对胞外聚合物及污泥脱水效果影响
Fig. 8 Fluorescence spectra of total extracellular polymers after WAS conditioned with 3.0 g/L K2FeO4图8 3.0 g/L高铁酸钾调理后总胞外聚合物荧光光谱图 |
Table 4 Peak of extracellular polymer fluorescence spectrum after WAS conditioned with 3.0 g/L K2FeO4表4 3.0 g/L K2FeO4调理后胞外聚合物荧光光谱峰位 |
Samples | EX/EM / nm | Main materials |
---|---|---|
T-EPS | 205.0/365.0 | Aromatic protein |
250.0/405.0 | Fulvic acid-like | |
255.0/430.0 255.0/440.0 260.0/445.0 320.0/395.0 | Humic acid-like | |
285.0/345.0 | Protein-like | |
S-EPS | 205.0/345.0 205.0/375.0 | Aromatic protein |
250.0/405.0 250.0/425.0 | Fulvic acid-like | |
255.0/420.0 255.0/435.0 320.0/395.0 | Humic acid-like | |
285.0/345.0 | Protein-like | |
LB-EPS | 230.0/345.0 | Aromatic protein |
235.0/515.0 240.0/390.0 240.0/525.0 245.0/535.0 250.0/550.0 | Fulvic acid-like | |
255.0/560.0 260.0/570.0 265.0/585.0 335.0/380.0 340.0/385.0 405.0/470.0 | Humic acid-like | |
255.0/280.0 260.0/285.0 265.0/290.0 270.0/300.0 275.0/305.0 280.0/310.0 280.0/340.0 285.0/315.0 290.0/325.0 305.0/340.0 310.0/350.0 | Protein-like | |
TB-EPS | 220.0/295.0 225.0/335.0 225.0/365.0 | Aromatic protein |
205.0/575.0 245.0/535.0 250.0/545.0 | Fulvic acid-like | |
255.0/280.0 260.0/285.0 270.0/300.0 275.0/305.0 280.0/310.0 280.0/350.0 | Protein-like | |
255.0/560.0 260.0/575.0 265.0/585.0 270.0/595.0 335.0/380.0 | Humic acid-like |
Fig. 9 Protein (a) and polysaccharide (b) contents of EPS samples after WAS conditioned with K2FeO4图9 高铁酸钾调理后胞外聚合物蛋白质含量(a)和多糖含量(b) |
Table 5 The Zeta potential changes of EPS samples after WAS conditioned with K2FeO4表5 高铁酸钾调理后胞外聚合物界面电动势变化 |
Sample | Zeta potential / mV |
---|---|
T-2.8 | -23.9 |
T-3.0 | -9.9 |
T-3.2 | -9.5 |
S-2.8 | -23.0 |
S-3.0 | -18.0 |
S-3.2 | -8.6 |
LB-2.8 | -2.7 |
LB-3.0 | -1.2 |
LB-3.2 | -0.5 |
TB-2.8 | 0.0 |
TB-3.0 | +0.2 |
TB-3.2 | +2.2 |
Fig. 10 FTIR of EPS samples after WAS conditioned with K2FeO4: (a) T-EPS; (b) S-EPS; (c) LB-TPS; (d) TB-EPS图10 高铁酸钾调理后胞外聚合物红外光谱图:(a)总胞外聚合物;(b)S-EPS;(c)LB-EPS和(d)TB-EPS |
Fig. 11 Settling curves of activated sludge conditioned with K2FeO4图11 高铁酸钾调理后活性污泥时间-界面高度曲线 |
Fig. 12 The results of CST and moisture contents after WAS conditioned with K2FeO4图12 高铁酸钾调理后活性污泥毛细吸水时间和含水率 |